Close Menu
  • Home
  • Cybercrime and Ransomware
  • Emerging Tech
  • Threat Intelligence
  • Expert Insights
  • Careers and Learning
  • Compliance

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Securing Edge AI in Customer Environments

September 5, 2026

SilkParasite Espionage Campaign Launches Five New RATs Against Central Asian Governments

September 4, 2026

Unlocking the Power of Lasso’s AI Security Platform

September 4, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
The CISO Brief
  • Home
  • Cybercrime and Ransomware
  • Emerging Tech
  • Threat Intelligence
  • Expert Insights
  • Careers and Learning
  • Compliance
Home » Google Vertex AI Bucket Squatting Enables Model Hijacking
Most Read

Google Vertex AI Bucket Squatting Enables Model Hijacking

Staff WriterBy Staff WriterJune 16, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read3 Views
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

Top Highlights

  1. Attackers can hijack Google Cloud Vertex AI models by creating predictable storage buckets and replacing uploaded models with malicious ones before they’re loaded, exploiting default SDK behaviors.
  2. Loaded malicious models can run arbitrary code inside Google’s infrastructure, enabling theft of OAuth tokens and access to sensitive data across tenant projects.
  3. The vulnerability’s fix involves verifying bucket ownership and randomizing bucket names, emphasizing the importance of explicitly setting secure configurations and updating SDKs to prevent exploitation.

Threat Overview, Attack Techniques, and Targets

The flaw in Google Cloud Vertex AI SDK for Python allows attackers to hijack model uploads. An attacker with no access to a victim’s project can exploit this flaw. They only need the victim’s project ID, which is often public, and their own Google Cloud project. The attacker creates a Cloud Storage bucket with a predictable name based on the project ID and region. If the victim does not set a specific bucket, the SDK automatically generates this name. The SDK checks if the bucket exists but does not verify ownership.

Because bucket names are unique worldwide, attackers can create the expected bucket first. When the victim uploads models, these are stored in the attacker’s bucket. The attacker can then swap the uploaded model with a malicious one. Many machine learning models saved with pickle or joblib can run code when loaded. When Vertex AI loads the malicious model, the attacker’s code executes inside the container.

The attack depends on speed. The attacker replaces the model within 1.4 seconds after the victim uploads it. This is fast enough to hide the swap from the victim. When successful, the payload steals an OAuth token from the container’s metadata server. The token can give the attacker access to other resources in the project, including models, logs, and internal data.

The vulnerability affects projects that do not set a specific staging bucket and rely on the default bucket name generation. It was reported by Unit 42 through Google’s bug bounty program. They observed no real-world exploitation so far.

Impact, Security Implications, and Remediation Guidance

This flaw can have serious consequences. Attackers can take control of machine learning models and execute malicious code. They can access sensitive data stored in Google Cloud, such as model weights, logs, and metadata. The stolen OAuth tokens can give attackers broad access to other cloud resources.

The security implications include potential data theft, model manipulation, and internal project access. Because the flaw resides in the client SDK, any environment that uses this SDK—such as notebooks, CI pipelines, or training scripts—may be vulnerable.

Google has addressed this issue by patching the SDK. Updates are available in version 1.144.0, which adds a random UUID to the bucket name. The latest fix is in version 1.148.0, which verifies bucket ownership and prevents bucket squatting.

To reduce risk, users should update to SDK version 1.148.0 or later. Developers should also specify a secure Cloud Storage bucket they control when uploading models. It is important to check the SDK version across all environments. Because the flaw involves predictable bucket names, setting explicit buckets reduces vulnerability.

For further details on remediation, users should consult guidance from Google or their security service provider.

Stay Ahead with the Latest Tech Trends

Stay informed on the revolutionary breakthroughs in Quantum Computing research.

Explore past and present digital transformations on the Internet Archive.

ThreatIntel-V1

AI Security CISO Insights cyber attack cyber risk Cybersecurity Exploitation MX1 risk management Threat Management vulnerability management
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleRokarolla Android Trojan Escalates to Complete Device Control
Next Article SprySOCKS Windows Variant: Kernel Drivers for Stealth Detection Evasion
Avatar photo
Staff Writer
  • Website

John Marcelli is a staff writer for the CISO Brief, with a passion for exploring and writing about the ever-evolving world of technology. From emerging trends to in-depth reviews of the latest gadgets, John stays at the forefront of innovation, delivering engaging content that informs and inspires readers. When he's not writing, he enjoys experimenting with new tech tools and diving into the digital landscape.

Related Posts

Securing Edge AI in Customer Environments

September 5, 2026

Unlocking the Power of Lasso’s AI Security Platform

September 4, 2026

AI Agents Breach Network in 10 Hours Using Exploits

September 4, 2026

Comments are closed.

Latest Posts

SilkParasite Espionage Campaign Launches Five New RATs Against Central Asian Governments

September 4, 2026

Operation QUICSILVER Strikes Myanmar Government and IT with Backdoor Attack

September 1, 2026

Mirage2FA Surge: 4,500 US & EU Companies Under Attack via Microsoft 365 Logins

August 29, 2026

Active Gitea RCE Exploitation Delivers Miner-Like Payload

August 26, 2026
Don't Miss

Securing Edge AI in Customer Environments

By Staff WriterSeptember 5, 2026

Edge AI shifts responsibility to customers for verifying the security, trustworthiness, and integrity of AI…

Unlocking the Power of Lasso’s AI Security Platform

September 4, 2026

AI Agents Breach Network in 10 Hours Using Exploits

September 4, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Recent Posts

  • Securing Edge AI in Customer Environments
  • SilkParasite Espionage Campaign Launches Five New RATs Against Central Asian Governments
  • Unlocking the Power of Lasso’s AI Security Platform
  • AI Agents Breach Network in 10 Hours Using Exploits
  • Insurers Hunt for Solutions to Contain Rogue AI
About Us
About Us

Welcome to The CISO Brief, your trusted source for the latest news, expert insights, and developments in the cybersecurity world.

In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, staying informed about cyber threats, innovations, and industry trends is critical for professionals and organizations alike. At The CISO Brief, we are committed to providing timely, accurate, and insightful content that helps security leaders navigate the complexities of cybersecurity.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube WhatsApp
Our Picks

Securing Edge AI in Customer Environments

September 5, 2026

SilkParasite Espionage Campaign Launches Five New RATs Against Central Asian Governments

September 4, 2026

Unlocking the Power of Lasso’s AI Security Platform

September 4, 2026
Most Popular

CISA Alerts: Critical Vulnerability in Splunk Enterprise Under Active Attack

June 19, 2026152 Views

Salesforce Disables Klue App After Data Breach from Token Abuse

June 19, 2026150 Views

Gefährliche Angriffe: Wie Cyberkriminelle Ihre Identität angreifen

January 29, 2026147 Views

Archives

  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025

Categories

  • Compliance
  • Cyber Updates
  • Cybercrime and Ransomware
  • Editor's pick
  • Emerging Tech
  • Events
  • Featured
  • Insights
  • Most Read
  • Threat Intelligence
  • Uncategorized
© 2026 thecisobrief. Designed by thecisobrief.
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.